Ipuwer Papyrus

Egyptian lament of a land turned upside down · New Kingdom copy of an older poem

Overview

A long hieratic papyrus in Leiden, bought in 1828 from the collection of Giovanni Anastasi, who said it came from Memphis. The front (recto) holds a literary poem in seventeen pages, with the beginning lost and pages 8-17 badly damaged. The back holds sun hymns in a different, later hand. Alan H. Gardiner published the text and translation in 1909. He measured the roll at 378 cm long and 18 cm high.

The speaker is a sage named Ipuwer. He laments a land in collapse: civil strife, plundered tombs and offices, servants taking their masters' place, foreigners ('Asiatics') in the Delta, trade with Byblos and Keftiu cut off, famine, death, and a river that 'is blood'. The latter part addresses a 'Lord of All', and the final pages are fragmentary. Most of the poem is built from refrains repeated line after line ('Forsooth...', 'Behold...', 'Destroyed is...').

Modern readers who connect it with the Exodus point to the blood-river line and the general picture of catastrophe. Egyptologists connect it with a period of internal breakdown in Egypt, or read it as a literary lament. The manuscript itself names no king, no Hebrews and no Moses, has no plague sequence, and carries no internal date.

In its own words

Forsooth, (men's) hearts are violent. Plague is throughout the land. Blood is everywhere. … Forsooth, the river is blood, and (yet) men drink of it. Men shrink from (?) (tasting) human beings, and thirst after water.A. H. Gardiner, The Admonitions of an Egyptian Sage from a Hieratic Papyrus in Leiden (Pap. Leiden 344 recto) (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1909), translation of Admonitions 2,5-6 and 2,10 (page.line of the papyrus). Gardiner notes that the word he renders 'plague' in 2,5 is the word the first Sallier papyrus uses of the Hyksos.

What the evidence shows

Open questions

Sources

  1. A. H. Gardiner, The Admonitions of an Egyptian Sage from a Hieratic Papyrus in Leiden (Pap. Leiden 344 recto) (Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1909) link editio princeps
  2. J. Van Seters, 'A Date for the "Admonitions" in the Second Intermediate Period', Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 50 (1964): 13-23. doi:10.1177/030751336405000104 (JSTOR 3855738) link study
  3. R. Enmarch, A World Upturned: Commentary on and Analysis of The Dialogue of Ipuwer and the Lord of All (Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 2009). doi:10.5871/bacad/9780197264331.001.0001 link study
  4. I. Velikovsky, Ages in Chaos, vol. I (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1952) link study
  5. Library of Congress Name Authority: 'Rijksmuseum van Oudheden te Leiden. Manuscript. Papyrus I. 344, recto' (no2006038388) link museum record
Corrected from the earlier edition of this page
  • The old entry dated the papyrus to 'the Middle Kingdom period' and called it a 'copy of a text originally composed during the 13th Dynasty' surviving in 'a later copy from the 12th century BCE'. The surviving manuscript is a New Kingdom copy whose hand Gardiner (1909) dates to no earlier than the start of the 19th Dynasty. The date of composition is disputed (12th Dynasty per Gardiner; Second Intermediate Period per Van Seters 1964) and is not fixed at the 13th Dynasty.
  • The old entry gave the length as 'approximately 3 meters'. Gardiner measured it at 378 cm long and 18 cm high.
  • The old entry gave the discovery as 'Early 19th century, Egypt'. The papyrus was bought at the Anastasi sale in 1828. Anastasi gave Memphis (Saqqara) as its source, and it has no excavated findspot.
  • The old entry said the text describes 'the suffering of the poor, the plundering of the wealthy'. It mostly describes the reverse: the poor become rich and servants take their masters' places (Gardiner's section on the social order reversed).
  • The old entry said the papyrus reveals conditions 'that may have contributed to... the Israelites' enslavement and subsequent liberation'. The text never mentions Israelites, slaves leaving Egypt or any plague sequence. The foreigners it names are Asiatics entering the Delta.
  • The old entry said 'many scholars draw parallels'. The specific parallel reading is Velikovsky's (1952). The shared material is one image, a blood-river, plus general disaster themes.

Checked against new publications through 2026-09.